Intelligent Reading

The premise of the book Reading and Criticism by Raymond Williams is to encourage ‘intelligent reading’, which according to the author is to read with an open, attentive mind, and to also focus on the use of language. Well… he might have been proud of GoodReads then, since most of my GR friends read intelligently judging by their interests and their reviews. But let’s face facts, those who read intelligently are a small school of fish in the vast ocean, and Williams doesn’t shy away from expressing the drivel that most people read. In fact, the opening chapter analyzes some extracts of advertisements to show the level to which language is manipulated in order to serve a purpose. He then quickly uses this to express the same sentiments in news writing and how all this kind of quick, easy reading perpetuates commercial writing (aka ‘entertainment’ fiction). There’s a lot of merit to his arguments and his down-to-earth analysis, even though this book was published in 1950.

What I could mostly appreciate is the way he encourages readers to read analytically. It’s not academia and it doesn’t require skills that a regular reader can’t acquire. Chapter after chapter, he demonstrates how readers can make better sense of prose and verse by comparing extracts throughout with what he judges as ‘good’ writing and ‘mediocre’ writing – and I’m inclined to agree with his assessments here. It’s an easy book in the sense that technical jargon is not introduced. Instead, Williams relies on the ‘feel’ of language and what works, or not. This makes the book genuine in that it is indeed for readers seeking to learn how to read more critically, rather than it be a treatise on reading like some books end up being.

Every improvement in reading – the growth of awareness and flexibility and honesty – represents an advance similar, in its smaller degree, to the advance made by the work of a creative artist. For it, too, extends the boundaries of human consciousness and creates again the most permanent of human values. That is why it is a task important in itself, just as literature is important for its own sake. It is an importance that needs no apology, but rather allegiance and application.

I would love to see someone publish a book like this today to cover the same topic discussing contemporary fiction, and why the Mtv kids that do actually read shouldn’t think YA is the only form of fiction out there. It’s my only qualm with this book, that a British writer from a British university references the same classics (Lawrence, Conrad, Orwell…), although kudos that Williams references what was then contemporary in 1950.

Samir

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Intelligent Reading

  1. I’m also a strong proponent of “intelligent reading,” but that said, I also understand the importance of “entertainment reading.” Sometimes the mind does need a break…something fun…um, ENTERTAINING. I think each has its place. What I don’t agree with, however, is the glut of “dumbed down reading/entertainment.” Curious, though, is this powerful subgroup of writers I’m finding, who really care about the employment of “intelligence” in writing, and, really, in life itself, and how the whole “New Indie” publishing phenomena is a perfect outlet for it, because, really, readers don’t care WHERE a book comes from! You know, it’s almost like the “Literature” phenomena of “old,” where that was once the bastion of intelligent writing and reading, but has—sadly—apparently also become infected with the same malady as the commercial realm.

    Great post, Samir!

    1. An insightful comment, thanks fpdorchak. There’s also well written entertainment stuff, certainly not as much or as popular as purely commercial stuff, but it’s there for those who want it. Besides, many of the classics are entertainment (at least they were in their time of publication) and only became classics because they would establish the first milestone in something or challenge contemporary conventions storywise. As for modern indie publishing, that’s something I’ll have to explore in due time (Marc Schuster’s reviews are perfect for that @ http://smallpressreviews.wordpress.com/). For now, I trudge on with the classics and with old books on literature… Ah, all that reading to be done… yay!

      1. Thank you, sir, and truly there is NOT enough time in a day anymore! :-] And, yes, they are classics because of that. Can anymore “classics” be created, one wonders, since, as anyone also knows, all the basic stories have already been “done”? Well, I’ve read some good work that are mirrors of something previous, and kinda knew how it/they would end…and kept reading because, simply put, they had been we;;-written in interesting, so, maybe, I’ve answered my own question! Good post, Samir!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s